Joint family free essay sample

In India, the land of culture and unity, culture and unity are wellmanifested in the structure of society, indeed in the smaller unit of a society i. e. family. A family is a set of human beings related to each other in a non-professional manner, giving rise to a concrete cohesion within the family. Love, care, and affection are the  most prominent human values, which are responsible for maintaining these bonds of relationships withina family. Typically, a nuclear family may be conceived as  a unit consisting of acouple, children, and grandparents, and pets. In India however, there exists a special kind of family structure that  really is quite vivid in the way it manages to handle and keep  intact the human relations. This special kind of family structure is Joint Family System. A joint family is a collection of more than one, nuclear families that are  interconnected by blood relations or marital relations. All the members, regardless of which particular nuclear family (within that joint family) they belong to, live together and share happiness, grief, and virtually every kind of problem and joy together. The joint family in  itself simulates a typical view  of our multi-cultural, multi-lingual, yet  tightly intertwined Indian society. Indian president replies to a question related to spiritual strengths of Indians â€Å"One of our strengths is our joint familysystem. In this system a problem is no problem. In a nuclear family a  problem can destroy afamily. We have a number of religions. I find  thatreligions are like orchards, but they need to belinked. Every religion preaches compassion andlove. If we can transform religion into a spiritualforce then we have arrived. By 2020 we shouldbe a  prosperous and happy nation without losingour civilizational heritage†¦. † Objective 1. The primary objective of the present study was to investigate therelationship of family structure and  social values as they relate tofamily structure in contemporary Indian society. Specifically    study attempts to look at  the relationship of  social values of Parentsand their  Children in  joint  and nuclear  families 2. The board objective of the study is to know why Youth prefernuclear family most as compare to joint family. 3. To know theimpact of western culture impact on the Indian youthtoday and change inpreference of youth for family. 4. To know the main reason in the increase of nuclear families ordecrease in joint families. SCOPE/NEED OF THE STUDY †¢to know how fast the patron of joint family is changing †¢To see the rate of change in the preference of the youth for family. †¢How Weston culture affect our and  our family life. †¢Is it affecting the  youth in negative or positive way. SETTING-UP OF HYPOTHESIS: †¢H0: the youth preference for nuclear family is increasing day byday †¢H1: the youth preference for joint family is not increasing, itdecreasing day by day. I have even focused on some articles that are in the favor of my research The study attempts to look at  the relationship of  social values of Parents and their  Children in  joint  and nuclear  families   Ã¢â‚¬ ¢As my sample size is of 100 people that is more than 30 so iwill use Z-test taking Level of significance (LOS) at 5%. DEFINITIONS USED IN THE PATTERN OF  FAMILY  STRUCTURE Type of family Definition Single  Member  The  respondent  who  is  alone Broken  Nuclear  Head  without  spouse  but  with  or  without  unmarried Children Nuclear  family  this  type  of  family  includes  Nuclear  pair  i. e. Head and Spouse with or  without unmarried Children Supplemented Nuclear It includes three types of  families (a) Supplemented Nuclear: Head and spouse with or without unmarried children but with other Relations who are not currently having Spouses(b) Broken Extended Nuclear: Head without spouse But with otherrelations of whom only one is Having spouse(c) Supplemented Broken Nuclear: Head without Spouse with or withoutunmarried children  but  With  other  unmarried/separated/  divorced/Widowed relation  Joint family  It includes  both lineally extended and Collaterally extended families Barring a few states, analmost similar picture is evident in rural-urban differences in all the statesof India. Further, the distribution of family size by  type of family reveals amean size of 7. 93 in the urban areas and 8. 16 in the  rural areas among  joint families, and 3. 35 and 3. 24  respectively among broken nuclearfamilies. The nuclear family households have a mean family householdsize of 4. 39 in  urban areas and 4. 54 members in rural areas. The average family size is significantly higher in almost all the lessdeveloped states in India. States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and  Rajasthanhave an average household size greater than six. On  the other hand ,the southern states of india. Article Name: 72% city women prefer nuclearfamilies by: Chitra Nair, TNN, Nov 5, 2009, 06. 41am IST In this Article is explained that a  Survey is carried by a famous matrimonialportal to find out  the Preference of youth for Nuclear family or Join family and itappears that most of working women (72%) want to be live in  a nuclear family. The woman, who holds a well-paying job, wanted to live  in a separate house toavoid complications later. The young techies opinion perhaps reflects a growingtrend among city women. The survey carried out by a popular  matrimonial portalclaims to reveal changing attitudes among city youth towards various aspects of  marriage. And in some matters, it appears, the fairer sex may be more open  tochange. According to the survey, for instance, almost 72% of Pune women preferto live in a nuclear  family, as opposed to just 50% men who favour the idea. The survey also highlights that questions like caste and horoscope matches arealso losing importance among the citys youth. The survey also askedrespondents how important it was for them to know their partner  beforemarriage. A whopping 90% of female respondents from the city said it  wasextremely important, as opposed to some 79% men who said the same The survey also highlights that questions like caste and horoscope matches arealso losing importance among the citys youth. The survey also askedrespondents how important it was for them to know their partner  beforemarriage. A whopping 90% of female respondents from the city said it  wasextremely important, as opposed to some 79% men who said the same The survey also highlights that questions like caste and horoscope matches arealso losing importance among the citys youth. The survey also askedrespondents how important it was for them to know their partner  beforemarriage. A whopping 90% of female respondents from the city said it  wasextremely important, as opposed to some 79% men who said the same The survey also highlights that questions like caste and horoscope matches arealso losing importance among the citys youth. The survey also askedrespondents how important it was for them to know their partner  beforemarriage. A whopping 90% of female respondents from the city said it  wasextremely important, as opposed to some 79% men who said the same The survey also highlights that questions like caste and horoscope matches arealso losing importance among the citys youth. The survey also askedrespondents how important it was for them to know their partner  beforemarriage. A whopping 90% of female respondents from the city said it  wasextremely important, as opposed to some 79% men who said the same The survey also highlights that questions like caste and horoscope matches arealso losing importance among the citys youth. The survey also askedrespondents how important it was for them to know their partner  beforemarriage. A whopping 90% of female respondents from the city said it  wasextremely important, as opposed to some 79% men who said the same The survey also highlights that questions like caste and horoscope matches arealso losing importance among the citys youth. The survey also askedrespondents how important it was for them to know their partner  beforemarriage. A whopping 90% of female respondents from the city said it  wasextremely important, as opposed to some 79% men who said the sameb) Collaterally extended family Head and Spouse with marriedbrother/sister and  Their spouses with or without other Relation [includingb) Collaterally extended family Head and Spouse with marriedbrother/sister and  Their spouses with or without other Relations.